�鶹��Ƶ

Significant Disagreements among Corps & EPA U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Deputy Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, Major General John Peabody, cited significant issues in the Waters of the United States final rule prior to its release in a May 15 memorandum to Assistant U.S. Secretary for the Army for civil works, Jo-Ellen Darcy. The final rule redefines ‘waters of the U.S.’ and expands the waters over which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers claim jurisdiction. The two agencies jointly published the final rule on June 29, and it takes effect on August 28.

Does your company use towels, rags or absorbents to clean machinery, parts or spills? If yes, then you will want to know about a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that may exclude your “solvent-contaminated wipes” from the hazardous waste regulations. The federal rule took effect in January 2014 in states where EPA still runs the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program. Since then, many other states have adopted EPA’s burden-reduction rule.

July 30 UPDATE: A Judicial Panel on Multi-District litigation has randomly selected the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in which to consolidate the multiple challenges to the WOTUS rule filed in circuit courts across the country - click here. EPA and the Army Corps have also asked the Panel to consolidate the pending (and future) district court actions in the District Court for the District of Columbia.

Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed by a vote of 258-166 legislation introduced by Rep. David McKinley (R-W.V.) to roll back certain parts of the Environment Protection Agency’s regulations of coal ash. A similar bill has been introduced by Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.V.). Senator Hoeven will offer his legislation as an amendment to the highway & transit bill currently being debated on the Senate floor.

The Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a final rule detailing the extent of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act in the Federal Register this week. The 60-day effective date clock starts upon publication, making the rule effective August 28, 2015. With the rule now final, there are likely to be many implementation questions, concerns and even new guidance. �鶹��Ƶ is working to update information on the Construction Industry Compliance Assistance Center with the latest available resources. However, �鶹��Ƶ’s efforts to inform its members on the new rule will span several months as it becomes clearer how the rule will be implemented.

The Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a final rule detailing the extent of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act in the Federal Register this week. The 60-day effective date clock starts upon publication, making the rule effective August 28, 2015. With the rule now final, there are likely to be many implementation questions, concerns and even new guidance. �鶹��Ƶ is working to update information on the Construction Industry Compliance Assistance Center with the latest available resources. However, �鶹��Ƶ’s efforts to inform its members on the new rule will span several months as it becomes clearer how the rule will be implemented.

While Rule Includes �鶹��Ƶ-Backed Revisions, We Are Working with Congress to Restart the Rulemaking Process to Address Many Other of the Measure’s Flaws

Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chair of the Committee on Environment & Public Works, is asking the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to launch an investigation into EPA's campaign to promote support for its rule, examining whether the agency might have violated federal lobbying laws.

Two different Senate committees held hearings examining the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) pending ruleredefining federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Both examined the impending regulation through different lenses to highlight the impact on the regulated community.

The House approved a measure to rescind the administration’s controversial proposed rule redefining “Waters of the U.S.” By a vote of 261-155, the House passed H.R. 1732, which would require EPA and the Corps to withdraw the regulatory proposal within 30 days and then set up a consultation process with state and local stakeholders as well as industry and small businesses in an effort to craft a new, better rule.